Tags
Civilization, Death of Civilization, Erik von Kuehnelt-Leddihn, Identitarianism, Left, Politics of Emotion, Politics of Reason, Reason, Right
Reason rather than sentiment is the distinguishing mark separating man from beast. Naturally reason, wrongly employed, perverted and under the yoke of emotions, is worse than mere sentimentalism-and this, precisely, was the “rationalism” of the Enlightenment. God created man, after all, in such a way that his head is above his heart.
–Erik von Kuehnelt-Leddihn, Leftism
Politics have long ago ceased to be about reasonably serving the Common Good, and if anything the general trend of politics these days only proves this. Not only has the rejection of reason influenced the political sphere, but every other important aspect of life as well. Reality is constantly being denied and in its place our “feelings” are enthroned, when we know that this is clearly wrong. Yet how can we know what is Right when it certainly seems that these mass movements of emotional politics are our last hope?
The danger is at first subtle. After all, what could be more important for the people of these dark times than “the preservation of cultural heritage and identity?” And isn’t our emotional reaction justified? But there is something more important than preservation of culture, and the name of it is Civilization, the moral framework which binds persons together for the Greatest Good. And this is how Civilization dies, in the howls of the mobs blinded by emotion, lashing out against anything and everything demanding something from them. Fallen nature reverts to the basic instincts of fear and hatred, attacking anything “unlike” itself, anything it senses as a threat to its own comfort, and becomes potter’s clay in the hands of those willing to feed the fires of anarchy whose only purpose is their own benefit.
Such men easily mislead the masses, but is there one of them who really leads his people by Right Reason? Political concepts, even ordinary words have lost their very meanings to twisted definitions, undermining the arguments of those who argue against them, under the influence of these “leaders”. It’s understandable that such errors should exist amidst the Left, but even those relatively “Right” (the Catholic Political Tradition is “the Right”) are misled and fall into the snares of arguing while using these emotional and ideologically twisted definitions.
This is not to say that emotions do not have their proper place, but at most they can only make the problem obvious, and never provide the solution. Rather, the solution most be found with God-given right Reason (informed but not distorted by the emotions), the foundation of Authority, Liberty, Justice, and Mercy. If we reject right reason, the very reality of man’s nature, if we join the Modern Identitarians and are mastered by our emotions, how are we different from the Leftists, from the Muslims who believe only in the will of Allah, and deny both Reason and Freedom? Should we be surprised that when we have instituted Nationalistic Anarchy, we will find ourselves under the yoke of an Internationalist tyranny? There is no evil so evil as the counterfeit of Good, which ensnares so many good people.
It seems hopeless then, to hope in this Age of the Politics of Emotion which can only end in fear and hate that Civilization will survive at all. It seems hopeless but it isn’t. It isn’t so long as even only a small number of us hold fast to the truth, so long as we are lights which the darkness can not conquer, reasoning, believing, and hoping no matter how long the night, living truly noble lives, radiating goodness, never hating even our enemies but always willing to defend that which we love, seeking always the Good of others over our own, if even a few of us did this we would be ever-worthy Defenders of Civilization. It may very well be that the Nationalistic anarchy runs rampant across the world until crushed by the iron hand of International Tyranny, but neither Anarchy nor Tyranny will ever completely destroy Christendom, if its defenders stand firm in their conviction to its ideal of unity, supported by all the hosts of Heaven, and spread the Truth how ever far they are able, in the hope of the Emperor-King’s eventual return.
While I can understand the core of your article, I would actually say that reason is overrated. These days there are these ‘new atheists’ who claim that God does not exist because you cannot prove it with logic and reason. And I agree with them: God is not rational or reasonable, he is above that. But then again, reason alone does not and cannot solve all problems in the world. Many people who feel suicidal or depressed cannot be ‘reasoned’ out of their misery, but if they believe in God, then they can get out of that. God for me is not rational, and thank Heaven for that.
LikeLike
I can understand how you came to that conclusion, but to understand where I’m coming from, you have to look at Traditional Catholic Thomistic philosophy. When we say that God made Man in His Image and Likeness, what does it mean? It means that God the Divine Reason, the Logos that was with God and is God, made Man with a immortal and rational Soul, by which we can know Him. To quote a fictional dialogue from Chesterton, “Ah, yes, these modern infidels appeal to their reason; but who can look at those millions of worlds and not feel that there may well be wonderful universes above us where reason is utterly unreasonable?”
“No,” said the other priest; “reason is always reasonable, even in the last limbo, in the lost borderland of things. I know that people charge the Church with lowering reason, but it is just the other way. Alone on earth, the Church makes reason really supreme. Alone on earth, the Church affirms that God himself is bound by reason.”
Thus is if you accept the Logos, the Divine Reason, and that He made Man with a Rational Nature, than it becomes clear that Man is rightly ordered when he is lead by right reason, even in a fallen nature. A Man is disordered when another faculty of his Soul, say his emotions or his will, takes the place of reason, as is the case in the depressed or the suicidal. And while God does not always act through Reason, He always acts according to Reason, even if we cannot see the Reason, So even when a Man does not act through Reason, he ought always to act according to Reason.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Further, God’s existence can actually be proved through right Reason, though the New Atheists unreasonably deny this. St. Thomas Aquinas himself puts forth the proofs for God’s existence in rational terms, though what we know about God cannot not be known only through Reason, which is why we believe in Divine Revelation. And I should add that Reason “alone” is certainly not enough, but rather Reason informed by the emotions, directing the will to right action.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Pingback: For the Readers… | The War for Christendom
Hapsburg Restorationist, you deserve to be commended for taking your Monarchism very seriously and thinking your position *all* the way through, especially with respect to the Natural law. Sadly, too many people these days, having realized something is incorrigibly wrong with Liberalism, conclude that the only alternative is something very much like Oriental despotism- and in doing so duplicate the assumptions of the very Liberal tradition they are trying to reject, with its false choice between “democracy” and tyranny with no middle term. The present, Liberal pig-sty can’t be seriously challenged by appeal to “authority” understood simply as the opposite of liberty- for that is merely superficial and indeed, puerile- but by rigorously discerning men’s rights and duties alike in the rational Nature of things.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you very much for commenting. If the past century tells us anything, it tells us that unless Liberty exists in Authority and Authority in Liberty, and both in Reason, we will continue to fluctuate between Anarchy and Tyranny. In the words of Fr. Robert Hugh Benson writing of the ideal Catholic society before the Great War,
“We encourage the individual to be as individualistic as possible, and draw the limits very widely, beyond which he mustn’t go. But those limits are imperative. We try to develop both extremes at once—liberty and law. We had enough of the via media—the mediocrity of the average—under Socialism.”
LikeLike
Do you know the source of the quote by Fr. Benson? I appreciate the work and thought that go into your writing. God bless.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you. The quote is from Fr. Benson’s book The Dawn of All, in which he explores his vision of a world where Catholicism is triumphant.
LikeLike